Saturday 9 September 2017

A 74-year-old lady with a history of ischaemic heart disease and severe congestive cardiac failure is admitted to the ICU with hypotension and presumed sepsis

A17

A 74-year-old lady with a history of ischaemic heart disease
and severe congestive cardiac failure is admitted to the
ICU with hypotension and presumed sepsis. She is sedated
and ventilated in pressure support mode. On examination
she is confused, BP is 85/35mmHg, HR is 115bpm (sinus
tachycardia), SpO2 is 95% on 60% oxygen. Arterial blood
gas analysis shows a lactate of 4.3mmol/L (39mg/dL).
Which is the BEST guide to the need for further intravenous
fluid replacement?


a. Response of oesophageal Doppler to passive leg raising.
b. Insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter and pulmonary artery
occlusion pressure measurement.
c. Titrate fluid resuscitation against repeated blood lactate
measurements.
d. Assess pulse pressure variation.
e. Urine output measurement.


A


This patient may have hypotension secondary to a variety of causes,
including sepsis and decompensated cardiac failure. 


Pulmonary artery 
occlusion pressure has been shown to be a poor predictor of whether a
fluid bolus will cause an increase in cardiac output (i.e. whether the patient
is volume-responsive). 


Blood lactate is a sensitive marker of shock and
falling levels correlate with improved survival.



 However, this will not
distinguish between cardiogenic shock (where inotropes may be required)
and septic shock (requiring fluids and/or vasopressors). 



Pulse pressure
variation of >13% has been shown to accurately predict response to fluid,
but is only reliable in mechanically ventilated patients without spontaneous
respiratory effort. 



Urine output measurement will again not distinguish
between different causes of shock. 



Passive leg raising autotransfuses
about 300ml of blood into the central circulation. 



If stroke volume
increases significantly (>10% as measured by oesophageal Doppler), this
indicates preload-responsiveness. 



An advantage of this technique is that it
is reversible if no improvement is seen, avoiding worsening pulmonary
oedema in the case of cardiogenic shock.

No comments:

Post a Comment